Charges Dismissed Against Former Healdsburg School District Official in Email Hacking Case


The husband of a Healdsburg school official who became embroiled in a hacking investigation has made no case against a computer crime as part of a deal with prosecutors, the authorities said Thursday. authorities.

Kestrel Davis Montes was the director of student services for the Healdsburg Unified School District when she and her husband Francisco Montes were investigated by the district over a fraudulent email sent to school staff . The email, which complained about a principal, involved hacking into the school’s computer system, said Carl Chapman, supervising inspector of the Northern California Computer Crime Task Force.

In Judge Arthur Wick’s courtroom on Wednesday, prosecutors dismissed the case against Davis Montes. Francisco Montes did not dispute a charge of the misdemeanor of unlawful access to a computer system and agreed to pay the district about $ 29,000 in restitution, Chapman said.

Francisco Montes, who also previously worked for the district, was sentenced to 24 months probation and 10 days in jail, Chapman said. The judge has suspended the prison sentence, which means Francisco Montes will not have to spend a day in prison if he successfully completes the probation period.

Wick dismissed all charges against Davis Montes, who had been charged with conspiring with her husband to commit the crimes. She has been on leave since December 1 due to the investigation.

Investigators suspected the couple attempted to complain to the principal anonymously by going into the messaging system and sending an email through someone else’s account, Chapman said.

Superintendent Chris Vanden Heuvel said the couple had already paid the restitution money to the district. It will be used to fund the district’s investigation into hacking. Vanden Heuvel said the case led the district to hire an outside provider to audit the security of its network.

You can contact Editor-in-Chief Julie Johnson at 521-5220 or [email protected]

Editor’s Note: This article has been edited to correct how the case against Montes was resolved.

Source link


Leave A Reply